Ballot paper is a right alternative for the evms??

Hello everyone welcome to my blog fakaitduniya.in this article is totally based on the evm issue that is now a days is a big issue in the country called INDIA. EVM means the electronic voting machine, india adopts the evm as the means for thr election in the year 1999. The evms didn’t run on the electricity it simply runs on the battery this makes it so usable that it ca be used for the voting in that areas where the electricity is unavailable. And the evm is so light in waight as compare to the ballot box so it can be move easily anywhere. The best thing about the evm is that the counting of the vote can be done so fast and the result of the election can be taken out in the hours and no any kind of mistake can be seen in the counting of the vote by using evm as because it is fully automatic.

But after the victory of the bjp in the uttar Pradesh many of leaders claimed that the evm is not secure and tells that no matter whom the vboter is voting the vote is going to the only B.J.P party its not the first time when the leaders are questioning about the evm. In the year 2009 when the congress was won the elction in the country then LAL KRISHAN AADVANI at that time also raised the questions on the evm. Then that time the supreme court suggests the election commission that since the 2019 all the evm should be linked with the VVPAT and that is linked by the election commission. After the link of VVPAT with the evm whenever the voter will vote on the evm he/she will see a receipt showing that which party is voted by him. This is done only for the saqtisfaction of the people.

But after the recent election the political parties that lost the election are claiming that the evm is tampred and every vote was gone to the B.J.P only and now they are demanded for the election by the  ballot paper through which the elections was used to be done earlier days. Since in many states the ballot paper is used for thr election of the local bodies.

Since the evm in india is playing a significant role for the india. Because the india is a country of very large population and if the elections can be done through the ballot paper then we can imagine that how much tree are needed to be cut to make such a large no. of the ballot paper. And since the environmental condition of the many cities in india is not so good so cutting that huge no. of trees will effect very badly on the public health.

The aap party is demanding so much about the elections through the use of ballot paper. If I am remembering right then it is that aap party which introduced the odd even traffic rule in the delhi for the control of the pollution in delhi and that step was get attracted so much towards the delhi. And now the same party is demanding the ballot paper system and by that they are showing the people that they are not much conscious about environment but they are only thinking about their victory or win in the election.

What responsibility does the citizen have towards environmental protection under our Constitution?
Environmental protection is a fundamental duty of every citizen of this country under Article 51-A(g) of our Constitution which reads as follows:
“It shall be the duty of every citizen of India to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife and to have compassion for living creatures.”

Source ;- http://www.environmentallawsofindia.com/the-constitution-of-india.html

DON’T you think they are not thinking about their duties about the fundamental duties?

If they are feeling that the evm can be tampered then they might demand for the use of other type of evm or if the election commission is inviting them to hack the evm then they should go to and prove that the evm can be hacked.

And why should the election commission will favour any party?

The election commission is the independent body and it doesn’t works under the influence of any party then why should they use that evm that can only favour the particular party?

Don’t you think that these leaders are questioning about the decision of the public?